For those who haven’t seen the award and pointscore proposal and a reminder to vote.
A rural based TPS member contacted me last night saying she had not seen the proposed changes to the TPS awards and pointscore system. I have put the proposal in the body of this email. If you have already seen this and voted, please accept my apologies for adding to the volume of messages in your in-box. As we can’t have a physical meeting and have a show of hands, we are asking for you to vote by sending an email to the president, indicating either yes or no, along with your name.
TPS Aggregate Competition Award System
Introduction
TPS changed its competition year from a mid year to mid year to a January to December cycle when it became apparent that the difficulty in obtaining non-TPS PSQ accredited judges was due to TPS being out of step with most other clubs. In the 2020, a near 50:50 TPS: non-TPS number of judges has been achieved.
This highlighted another problem – marked differences between the two sets of judges – see graph below
Reasons for the lower scores from non TPS judging could be:
- Lack of familiarity with our scoring system
- A mis-understanding of the Accepted award – in national or international competition this is a high award (often 25% or less are “accepted”, whereas in TPS, this is a poor image scoring only 1 point.)
- Not reading and comprehending our current guidelines.
To address these possibilities, a working group comprising the TPS committee, senior judges and 2 members (1 B grade, 1 A grade), met on 15 August 2020 to review the TPS awards and point score system.
Graham Harris undertook a review of the systems used by other clubs. The meeting agreed that the current TPS system was wordy and prescriptive and titles of the awards were uncommon. Many other clubs have fewer awards. The meeting also agreed that the terms Accepted and Rejected would no longer be used. Accepted has been deleted, and Rejected changed to Out of Category.
The following is based on Graham’s subsequent suggestions and has been modified following a discussion by TPS committee members on 24 August 2020.
Points to note:
- The proposal is to use the most commonly used terms for the awards – Honour, etc as below.
- The number of awards has been reduced but points remain the same. Hence Honour = six points, as is the TPS Gold award.
- Accepted and Bronze are deleted, and Rejected changed to Out of Category.
Awards
Alice Black Award – this is the image of the night in the opinion of the judge. This image is one that has significant impact for the judge as a result of technique, composition or story telling. It can be chosen from any grade or medium (print or digital)
Honour – This is awarded to an exceptional photograph which has impact, is technically excellent, well composed, shows originality and artistry, and has few if any flaws.
Merit – This is awarded to a very good photograph which meets high technical standards and also shows originality, artistry and good composition. Any flaws present are very minor.
Highly Commended – This is awarded to a good photograph with good technique, artistry and minor flaws.
Commended – This is awarded to a photograph which may have significant flaws that detract from the image and can be overcome or amended.
Out of Category – A photo that does not fit the criteriafor the competition is given this award.
A possible awards and points system for TPS could be:
| Points | |
| Honour | 6 |
| Merit | 4 |
| Highly Commended | 3 |
| Commended | 2 |
| Out of Category | 0 |
In addition Graham suggested assigning additional points to the image awarded the Alice Black Award – for example 2 additional points on top of the award received. This would be like a “jackpot” score, but at the end of year competition, the Alice Black of the Year could not have any point score as these have already been decided after the previous monthly competition. This is endorsed by the majority of the TPS committee. It will need to be added to EOY point scores manually, as there won’t be an automatic means of recording this on MPC, but a record of each image is kept and filed for the EOY competition.
Point scores and grading
The August 24 meeting is generally not in favour of grading by folio appraisal, but recognises its role for outstanding or highly proficient photographers. Such a folio requires being assessed by a panel, and the time involved could be onerous if significant numbers of members chose this option.
Instead, the meeting recommended an average point score system for movement between grades. A cursory examination of the pointscores to date shows that a maximum of 24 images could be submitted in the competition year to date (at August 2020). The maximum possible score is 6 golds x 24 images = 144. The top scoring competitor has 111 points, followed by a few with scores in the 90s. This means our top scoring entrants are attaining around 2/3 of the points on offer, and one has achieved ¾.
There has been further analysis on 2019 and 2020 – see attached below. These comprise 5 competitions in 2019 and 6 in 2020.
It is recommended that the % of total points attained for movement between grades be as follows:
| % of total competition year points attained | B grade to A grade | A grade to Salon grade | Movement between future levels in Salon grade |
| % | 55 | 60 | 65 |
Points to note:
- Grading by points provides incentive to enter the maximum number of images in a competition year.
- Grading by points rewards consistency of effort by members.
- Grading by points removes variability from “chance” or random effects based on awards only – i.e. a certain number of medal types.
- It may be possible to consider a combination of awards achieved and pointscore when considering grading, but it should not rely on awards alone.
- The points system starts at 2 out of six, rather than 1 out of six, and the wording of the Commended (2 points) award is intended to provide a clear separation between it and higher awards, and for the judge to only give this award to images where the first “impact” on viewing is technical error, rather than other qualities of the image. An example might be an image out of focus, overly dark, burnt out, etc.
| A grade 2019 | 2019 | 2019 | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | |
| No of entries | Point score | % of total 90 pts | No of entries | Pointscore | % of total 108 pts | |
| 15 | 61 | 67.8 | 18 | 62 | 57.7 | |
| 15 | 59 | 65.6 | 18 | 65 | 60.2 | |
| 15 | 59 | 65.6 | 18 | 59 | 54.6 | |
| 15 | 56 | 62.2 | 15 | 40 | 37 | |
| 15 | 54 | 60 | 18 | 44 | 40.7 | |
| 15 | 51 | 56.7 | 18 | 52 | 48.1 | |
| 15 | 51 | 56.7 | 18 | 52 | 48.1 | |
| 15 | 50 | 55.6 | 18 | 43 | 39.8 | |
| 15 | 50 | 55.6 | 15 | 37 | 34.3 | |
| 15 | 49 | 54.4 | 18 | 57 | 52.8 | |
| 15 | 48 | 53.3 | 15 | 45 | 41.7 |
| B Grade 2019 | 2019 | 2019 | 2020 | 2020 | 2020 |
| No of entries | Point score | % of total 90 pts | No of entries | Pointscore | % of total 108 pts |
| 15 | 60 | 66.7 | 18 | 54 | 50 |
| 15 | 57 | 63.3 | 18 | 57 | 52.8 |
| 15 | 54 | 60 | 18 | 38 | 35.2 |
| 15 | 52 | 57.8 | 18 | 53 | 49.1 |
| 15 | 52 | 57.8 | 18 | 47 | 43.5 |
| 15 | 51 | 56.7 | 18 | 40 | 37 |
| 15 | 50 | 55.6 | 18 | 50 | 46.3 |
| 15 | 48 | 53.3 | 15 | 42 | 38.9 |
| 14 | 51 | 56.7 | 18 | 60 | 55.6 |
| 12 | 54 | 60 | 18 | 71 | 65.7 |
| Salon grade 2020 | Score | %Score/108 Total Pts | 2019 | Score | %score/90 total pts |
| 18 | 87 | 80.6 | 15 | 73 | 81 |
| 18 | 67 | 62 | 15 | 65 | 72.2 |
| 18 | 65 | 60.2 | 15 | 57 | 63.3 |
| 18 | 60 | 55.6 | 15 | 63 | 70 |
| 18 | 53 | 49.1 | 15 | 64 | 71.1 |
| 18 | 51 | 47.2 | 15 | 60 | 66.7 |
| 15 | 63 | 58.3 | 15 | 58 | 64.4 |
| 15 | 57 | 52.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 51 | 47.2 | 9 | 40 | 44.4 |
by Account Deleted 1114, September 19, 2020
Vote now!
Members, please vote as per the request in the previous email. We need a YES or NO to the question regarding our proposed change to the scoring system.
I will record your name once I receive your vote.
Currently received votes from:
Cory Hagan
Graham Harris
Dennis Dowling
Travis Lord
Margaret Kebble
John Stewart
Andrew Raguse
Roberta Edwards
Jo Aspro
Mick Jones
Veronica Sorley
Terry Obrien
Jenny Graff
Tracey Nash
Peter Granfield
REDACTED
Tryg Helander
by Tryg Helander, September 18, 2020
Vote for proposed new award system
VOTING FOR THE FOLLOWING – 22 SEPTEMBER 2020
Do you support the following awards definitions and point score system for TPS as outlined as proposed by the TPS working group:
Proposed New Awards
Alice Black Award – this is the image of the night in the opinion of the judge. This image is one that has significant impact for the judge as a result of technique, composition or storytelling. It can be chosen from any grade or medium (print or digital)
Honour – This is awarded to an exceptional photograph which has impact, is technically excellent, well composed, shows originality and artistry, and has few if any flaws.
Merit – This is awarded to a very good photograph which meets high technical standards and also shows originality, artistry, and good composition. Any flaws present are very minor.
Highly Commended – This is awarded to a good photograph with good technique, artistry, and minor flaws.
Commended – This is awarded to a photograph which may have significant flaws that detract from the image and can be overcome or amended.
Out of Category – A photo that does not fit the criteriafor the competition is given this award.
The scores are as follows:
| Points | |
| Honour | 6 |
| Merit | 4 |
| Highly Commended | 3 |
| Commended | 2 |
| Out of Category | 0 |
Movement between grades will depend on the percentage of total competition points gained as follows:
| % of total competition year points attained | B grade to A grade | A grade to Salon grade | Movement between future levels in Salon grade |
| % | 55 | 60 | 65 |
The winner of the Alice Black award monthly competition receives 2 points, but the End of Year Alice Black does not, consistent with existing end-of year awards.
Yes/No
Please email back your vote, as a yes or a no, along with your name, NLT 22 September 2020.
by Tryg Helander, September 16, 2020
Skills Night
After our talk tonight with REDACTED, we will do a quick demonstration about changing colours with Lightroom CC. See you tonight!
The lesson on this exists here:
by Tryg Helander, September 15, 2020
TPS awards and pointscore proposal
Topic: Toowoomba Photographic society
Time: Sep 15, 2020 07:00 PM Brisbane
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89551745512?pwd=R2I1SEhPVFJxVWJpSURsRXN0NjZSZz09
Meeting ID: 895 5174 5512
Passcode: 233535
One tap mobile
+61861193900,,89551745512#,,,,,,0#,,233535# Australia
+61871501149,,89551745512#,,,,,,0#,,233535# Australia
Dial by your location
+61 861 193 900 Australia
+61 8 7150 1149 Australia
+61 2 8015 6011 Australia
+61 3 7018 2005 Australia
+61 731 853 730 Australia
Meeting ID: 895 5174 5512
Passcode: 233535
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kRvlZMJ6h
by Account Deleted 1114, September 15, 2020
Tuesday 15th Awards and pointscore presentation
Next Tuesday, our Zoom session will be a presentation on the TPS Awards and Pointscore System following a workshop attended by senior TPS judges, committee and member representatives last month.
Below is a link to the proposal which you can read ahead of next Tuesday. The Tuesday session will be open for discussion after the presentation. It is not intended any vote would be taken on Tuesday – that will be decided later.
by Account Deleted 1114, September 11, 2020
Alice Black award September
To perpetuate the memory of our late member Alice Black, the club has introduced the ‘Alice Black Memorial Trophy’ to be contested each year on a perpetual basis.
At each month’s Aggregate Competition the judge will select an image from all those entered as the monthly Alice Black Image – they will use their own criteria to select the image regardless of the score given. All images submitted in the Aggregate Competition have the potential to become a possible winner of the Trophy as there is no restriction on the grade of the entrant or the medium in which the image is presented.
by Account Deleted 1114, September 9, 2020
Results for competitions in September 2020
There were 57 entries that gained our highest award(s).
Members can view all images and comment on them by following this link
View / Comment entries in September 2020
click here to see a pdf catalog of all competition results
| Angles lines and light Jo Christensen – Gold A Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
After the Earthquake Evan Williams – Gold B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Into the vortex Travis Lord – Gold B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
Time to reflect Travis Lord – Gold B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Bridge with a difference John Stewart – Gold Salon Grade SetSubject Mono Digital  |
Changing Skyline Graham Burstow – Gold Salon Grade SetSubject Mono Print  |
| Crunch Robert Brown – Silver A Grade Open Colour Print  |
Old Cork Station on the Diamantina REDACTED- Silver A Grade Open Colour Digital |
| On golden pond – Hunter’s Gorge REDACTED – Silver A Grade Open Colour Digital |
Look at That Dean Mengel – Silver A Grade Open Colour Digital  |
| Sungrebe Andrew Raguse – Silver A Grade Open Colour Digital  |
Hairy Andrew Raguse – Silver A Grade Open Colour Digital  |
| Guggenheim from inside Val Shield – Silver A Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
Sunset at the Beach Dennis Dowling – Silver B Grade Open Colour Digital  |
| Eyes to the Future Peter McAuliffe – Silver B Grade Open Colour Digital  |
Kasbah Tangiers 1967 Brian Ireland – Silver B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Lines and shapes of the Empire . Robert Fox – Silver B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
9 11 Memorial NYC Evan Williams – Silver B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Past Its Use By Date Roberta Edwards – Silver B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
One English Summer Pierre Boudib – Silver Salon Grade Open Colour Digital  |
| Resting Heroes Michael Jones – Silver Salon Grade Open Colour Digital  |
Craigs hut in storm Peter Granfield – Silver Salon Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Craigs hut rainbow Peter Granfield – Silver Salon Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
Converging Towers Jenny Graff – Silver Salon Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Harsh Archicture Sandra Neill – Silver Salon Grade SetSubject Mono Digital  |
Cubist Architecture John Stewart – Silver Salon Grade SetSubject Mono Digital  |
| Opera House Graham Burstow – Silver Salon Grade SetSubject Mono Print  |
Follow the Lights Tryg Helander – Silver A Grade SetSubject Mono Digital  |
| Essential architecture Barry Whisson – Silver A Grade SetSubject Mono Digital  |
Water baby Sandy Adsett – Silver A Grade Open Mono Digital  |
| Couldn’t make the turn REDACTED – Bronze A Grade Open Colour Digital |
The Driver Can Wait Richard Wyton – Bronze A Grade Open Colour Digital  |
| The Stalker Dean Mengel – Bronze A Grade Open Colour Digital  |
Paper Daisies Nicola Lancaster – Bronze A Grade Open Colour Digital  |
| Oh What a Feeling Andrew Raguse – Bronze A Grade Open Colour Digital  |
Outshining Yesteryear Tryg Helander – Bronze A Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Granada Apartment building Val Shield – Bronze A Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
Gran Leslie Rook – Bronze B Grade Open Colour Digital  |
| Wiltshire Cathedral_3 Peter Allison – Bronze B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
Reflections of Present Veronica Sorley – Bronze B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| High Court of Singapore Jo-Ann Aspromourgos – Bronze B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
Singapore Shimmer Veronica Sorley – Bronze B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Cardboard Cathedral Christchurch NZ Evan Williams – Bronze B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
Alpaca Rescue Charlotte Lord – Bronze B Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| 3 Generations Pierre Boudib – Bronze Salon Grade Open Colour Digital  |
Blue Moon Rising Janine Waters – Bronze Salon Grade Open Colour Digital  |
| Keeping Lookout Michael Jones – Bronze Salon Grade Open Colour Digital  |
Wallaces Hut Peter Granfield – Bronze Salon Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| Wells Cathedral Pierre Boudib – Bronze Salon Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
Coloured light Jenny Graff – Bronze Salon Grade SetSubject Colour Digital  |
| mother hen Sara Hedley – Bronze Salon Grade Open Mono Digital  |
Tom Michael Jones – Bronze Salon Grade Open Mono Digital  |
| Terrace House Sydney Graham Burstow – Bronze Salon Grade SetSubject Mono Print  |
Classic Jo Christensen – Bronze A Grade SetSubject Mono Digital  |
| Centre Punch Tryg Helander – Bronze A Grade SetSubject Mono Digital  |
Best foot forward (dominant colour) Sandy Adsett – Bronze A Grade Open Mono Digital  |
| Under the over Jo-Ann Aspromourgos – Bronze B Grade SetSubject Mono Digital  |
by Margaret Kebble, September 8, 2020
Tuesday Competition Night
Zoom link:
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82841043847?pwd=ZTNtWTgxc2ZKSGlHUS9MSXhUSHBhQT09
Meeting ID: 828 4104 3847
Passcode: 074840
by Tryg Helander, September 7, 2020
Tuesday Night Club Competition – Architecture
Val Shield is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: Toowoomba Photographic society
Time: Sep 8, 2020 07:00 PM Brisbane
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82841043847?pwd=ZTNtWTgxc2ZKSGlHUS9MSXhUSHBhQT09
Meeting ID: 828 4104 3847
Passcode: 074840
One tap mobile
+61861193900,,82841043847#,,,,,,0#,,074840# Australia
+61871501149,,82841043847#,,,,,,0#,,074840# Australia
Dial by your location
+61 861 193 900 Australia
+61 8 7150 1149 Australia
+61 2 8015 6011 Australia
+61 3 7018 2005 Australia
+61 731 853 730 Australia
Meeting ID: 828 4104 3847
Passcode: 074840
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kphyfp0d8
Judge’s comments on September 2020 TPS competition
REDACTED
Thank you for the invitation to judge this month’s competition. Let me say a couple of things at the outset. Firstly, congratulations to all who entered the TPS competition this month with architecture as the set subject. It always takes a degree of courage to put your work up for judging as well as for public viewing.
Secondly, as most judges say at the outset, mine is an opinion, but judges shouldn’t hide behind that statement. By this I mean, that a person should become a judge armed with some knowledge of the subject, and a willingness to build on that knowledge.
How well I succeed in that task tonight is for you to judge.
The starting point for any judge should be to consider the club award and pointscore system, and the set subject guidelines.
Here are the architecture guidelines.
“This includes buildings or structures, interior or exterior, and any part thereof; dynamic images of architecture or architectural details. It includes industrial, bridges, historical sites, buildings, interiors.”
Architecture is a specialised field of photography, and no doubt there are specialised means of judging such competitions for architectural award photography. This is a club competition which happens to have architecture as its theme.
Hence, I am looking to see how well you have handled your assignment – technically, artistically, originality, your narrative and so on. The specific technical aspects of the genre are not of interest to me, and I confess to not even having tried to find out what these might be.
However, I have kept the guidelines in mind, and made reference to these on some occasions.
Even though the set subject seems on the surface like a record-taking topic, find a structure and photograph it, I am looking to see how you interpret the scene. Those who combine a unique or different approach, together with technical excellence, should score the higher awards, or least that was my intention.
Some of these same principles also apply to open images, particularly those that are common place. Examples might be sunrise/sunsets, water (rivers or oceans), and so on. You will occasionally hear from judges that they are looking for something just a little bit different. This means they have seen too many common place images, and are jaded as a result. If you take a common place image, it will score better if it has a less common feature or event occurring. Birds silhouetted against the sky/on the water, etc. As photography becomes even more ubiquitous, and images by the thousand flood our daily lives, the result is that the bar keeps being lifted.
In summary, the exception, or the less usual is what gets noticed.
In this competition I will have commented that some images are technically excellent, but these may not necessarily score the top awards unless I saw something less usual, even unique, in your image.
I am not a particularly “technical” judge, but I would comment that after having witnessed several years of judging, there are some issues that always draw comment. I have elaborated more on some of these in the references below.
I suggest especially to beginners, to pay close attention to these and address them in your work. Judges are only human, and if there are obvious technical faults, that provides an instant screening mechanism. This is more likely to go against you in competitions where may be thousands of images, and judges look for a quick way to get to the final few for higher awards.
Let me give an example in a completely different field – that of quilt judging. Hundreds can be sent to a national competition.
Quilts are held up quickly and the judge decides almost instantly, which of two piles they will be placed in. Any with an obvious technical flaw are never considered again.
In summary, the first thing all of us can do to give ourselves the best possible chance in competition is to minimise or eliminate obvious technical faults in our work.
Another point is to always read the set subject guidelines carefully. Some fields such as travel, nature and others have certain conventions or rules of which you should try to be aware. I have attempted to include some of these in my article “Traps for young players”, but having recently received a set of lengthy guidelines for nature and wildlife, these are a separate and quite specific field, and easy to fall foul of. I have added this to the references below. A club may decide to have a nature category for example, but unless the international guidelines are considered or at least brought to the attention of club members, the judge appointed may judge with these wider guidelines in mind, and not the comparatively brief set subject definition.
The next point is that having eliminated obvious technical faults, the process then is a subjective one. To me, this means making an emotional connection or responding in some way to your image. As a narrative type of person (which is already obvious), the story of the image is particularly important, and some of my commentary will reflect this.
Lastly, remember that if your particular image did not do as well as you had hoped, try it again in another competition.
In bigger competitions, the “acceptance” rate of images for further consideration is one in four or less. Experienced competitors try the same image a number of times, but if it still doesn’t gain the award they hoped for, put that that image aside and try something else.
Lastly, as a judge, I will remember what it is like to sit where you are sitting and remember a line from The Merchant of Venice.
“If you prick us, do we not bleed”.
Hopefully no-one’s metaphorical blood will be on the floor with the results from tonight’s judging.
http://www.koolkatquilting.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Traps-for-young-players.pdf
http://www.koolkatquilting.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Some-comments-on-composition-revised..pdf
file:///C:/Users/KoolKat/Downloads/Nature-Photography-Judges-Guide-2020-08.pdf
http://www.psq.org.au/uploads/9/2/9/2/92924276/psq_judges_manual_2019.pdf
by Account Deleted 1114, September 7, 2020
